Marc Leffler, DDS, Esq. not too long ago reported on a prison case the place a affected person unsuccessfully sued their former dentist when the dentist refused to refund them for failed remedy.
The affected person used to be being handled for high blood pressure, increased ldl cholesterol, and kind II diabetes when he used to be discovered to have periodontal bone loss and furcation involvement, resulting in the dentist recommending remedy of striking after which restoring 3 implants. The dentist really useful operating this process by means of their doctor and reiterated the dangers and advantages.
Sadly, the implants have been sooner or later misplaced and got rid of, inflicting frustration for the affected person. The affected person asked a complete refund, which the dentists refused, providing to proceed to regard the affected person at no further price.
The MedPro Workforce article stocks that the dentist “held speedy to her place, which she defined to E [the patient], that not anything were finished incorrectly or improperly, so she noticed no reason why to go back the charges paid, reiterating once more that she would re-do the failed remedy.”
The affected person sued as a self-represented plaintiff however the courtroom pushed aside the case with a verdict in want of the defendant.
Learn extra information about this example from MedPro Workforce.
